Indian cricket has been blessed with legends whose contributions transcend statistics, etching their names into the hearts of millions. Rohit Sharma and Virat Kohli , two modern giants, have exemplified this legacy, steering India to unprecedented heights with their bats and leadership. Yet, as their careers reach pivotal moments, a poignant question looms: do these icons deserve a grand farewell, and if so, who is to blame when such farewells fall short? Is it the players’ reluctance to step away at the right moment, or does the Indian cricket board (BCCI) and its selectors share the burden due to poor communication?
The answer is complex. The notion of a ‘proper farewell’ is deeply romanticised in cricket. Sachin Tendulkar’s tearful goodbye at Wankhede Stadium in 2013, with a meticulously planned final Test, set a gold standard. Fans expect their heroes to bow out on their terms, preferably with a century or a match-winning performance, accompanied by a lap of honor.
However, reality is often messier. Rohit’s recent step back from Test cricket was understated, lacking the fanfare befitting a player of his stature. Kohli’s retirement from Test cricket, at 36, similarly has left the cricket fraternity divided — some celebrated his monumental legacy, while others felt the exit lacked the grandeur his career warranted.
If Kohli and Rohit’s departure feels abrupt, it echoes the unceremonious retirements of past greats like Rahul Dravid or VVS Laxman, who retired after a torrid 2012 Australia tour without the pomp they deserved.
So, where does the fault lie? Players like Kohli and Rohit are fiercely competitive, driven by a hunger to contribute and a belief in their ability to defy time. This self-belief, while admirable, can cloud judgment. Kohli’s decision to retire from Tests, though voluntary, came amid scrutiny over his form, suggesting external pressures may have influenced his choice.
History offers examples: Kapil Dev lingered on his career even when he was past his prime in the 1990s, only to face criticism for delaying the inevitable. More recently, MS Dhoni’s ODI retirement in 2020 felt abrupt, announced via a cryptic Instagram post, leaving fans yearning for closure.
When players hold on too long, selectors face a dilemma — drop a legend and risk public backlash, or persist and hinder team progress.
Cricket boards worldwide struggle to manage transitions for iconic players and opaque communication exacerbates the issue.
Similarly, the handling of senior players like Yuvraj Singh, whose international career petered out without clarity, points to systemic flaws.
Intense scrutiny and focus on results often overshadows the emotional weight of a legend’s departure.
The answer is complex. The notion of a ‘proper farewell’ is deeply romanticised in cricket. Sachin Tendulkar’s tearful goodbye at Wankhede Stadium in 2013, with a meticulously planned final Test, set a gold standard. Fans expect their heroes to bow out on their terms, preferably with a century or a match-winning performance, accompanied by a lap of honor.
However, reality is often messier. Rohit’s recent step back from Test cricket was understated, lacking the fanfare befitting a player of his stature. Kohli’s retirement from Test cricket, at 36, similarly has left the cricket fraternity divided — some celebrated his monumental legacy, while others felt the exit lacked the grandeur his career warranted.
If Kohli and Rohit’s departure feels abrupt, it echoes the unceremonious retirements of past greats like Rahul Dravid or VVS Laxman, who retired after a torrid 2012 Australia tour without the pomp they deserved.
So, where does the fault lie? Players like Kohli and Rohit are fiercely competitive, driven by a hunger to contribute and a belief in their ability to defy time. This self-belief, while admirable, can cloud judgment. Kohli’s decision to retire from Tests, though voluntary, came amid scrutiny over his form, suggesting external pressures may have influenced his choice.
History offers examples: Kapil Dev lingered on his career even when he was past his prime in the 1990s, only to face criticism for delaying the inevitable. More recently, MS Dhoni’s ODI retirement in 2020 felt abrupt, announced via a cryptic Instagram post, leaving fans yearning for closure.
When players hold on too long, selectors face a dilemma — drop a legend and risk public backlash, or persist and hinder team progress.
Cricket boards worldwide struggle to manage transitions for iconic players and opaque communication exacerbates the issue.
Similarly, the handling of senior players like Yuvraj Singh, whose international career petered out without clarity, points to systemic flaws.
Intense scrutiny and focus on results often overshadows the emotional weight of a legend’s departure.
You may also like
We won't tolerate nuclear blackmail: PM Modi warns Pakistan
India-Pakistan Ceasefire: Will Travel Platforms Get Relief From Cancellation Spree?
Daily Horoscope For Tuesday, May 13, 2025, For All Zodiac Signs By Astrologer Vinayak Vishwas Karandikar
Little Disasters release date, cast and episodes for Paramount Plus's twisty thriller
Lizzo says that she has no friends in new interview – here's why
